Agent Semantics, Semantic Spacetime, and Graphical Reasoning
Mark Burgess

TL;DR
This paper explores the Semantic Spacetime graph model, its formal properties, and how it supports directed knowledge and process modeling, highlighting issues like information leakage and the role of boundary states.
Contribution
It formalizes the Semantic Spacetime model with a scalable representation and clarifies the role of absorbing states and boundary information in semantic graphs.
Findings
Defined a finite γ(3,4) representation for scalable operations
Identified the role of absorbing states in information leakage
Linked boundary states to intentionality and information injection
Abstract
Some formal aspects of the Semantic Spacetime graph model are presented, with reference to its use for directed knowledge representations and process modelling. A finite representation is defined to form a closed set of operations that can scale to any degree of semantic complexity. The Semantic Spacetime postulates bring predictability with minimal constraints to pathways in graphs. The ubiquitous appearance of absorbing states in any partial graph means that a graph process leaks information. The issue is closely associated with the issue of division by zero, which signals a loss of closure and the need for manual injection of remedial information. The Semantic Spacetime model (and its Promise Theory) origins help to clarify how such absorbing states are associated with boundary information where intentionality can enter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Cognitive Computing and Networks
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
