Vulnerability and Defence: A Case for Stackelberg Game Dynamics
Azhar Iqbal, Ishan Honhaga, Eyoel Teffera, Anthony Perry, Robin Baker, Glenn Pearce, and Claudia Szabo

TL;DR
This paper models the strategic interaction between drones and tanks in warfare as a Stackelberg game, analyzing the sequential decision-making process to understand tactical advantages and defense mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces a game-theoretic framework using Stackelberg equilibrium to analyze drone-tank interactions in modern warfare, highlighting strategic dynamics.
Findings
Strategic advantage of drones in sequential attack scenarios
Optimal defense strategies for tanks derived from game analysis
Insights into tactical decision-making in modern combat
Abstract
This paper examines the tactical interaction between drones and tanks in modern warfare through game theory, particularly focusing on Stackelberg equilibrium and backward induction. It describes a high-stakes conflict between two teams: one using advanced drones for attack, and the other defending using tanks. The paper conceptualizes this as a sequential game, illustrating the complex strategic dynamics similar to Stackelberg competition, where moves and countermoves are carefully analyzed and predicted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
