Explaining Risks: Axiomatic Risk Attributions for Financial Models
Dangxing Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces an axiomatic approach to fairly attribute risk in financial models using an extension of the Shapley value, enhancing interpretability of complex machine learning models in high-stakes sectors.
Contribution
It proposes a novel axiomatic risk attribution method based on Shapley values, specifically tailored for financial models, improving risk interpretability.
Findings
Risk can be effectively allocated using the extended Shapley value framework.
The method provides fair and interpretable risk attributions in complex models.
Empirical examples demonstrate the approach's practical effectiveness.
Abstract
In recent years, machine learning models have achieved great success at the expense of highly complex black-box structures. By using axiomatic attribution methods, we can fairly allocate the contributions of each feature, thus allowing us to interpret the model predictions. In high-risk sectors such as finance, risk is just as important as mean predictions. Throughout this work, we address the following risk attribution problem: how to fairly allocate the risk given a model with data? We demonstrate with analysis and empirical examples that risk can be well allocated by extending the Shapley value framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
