An Exploration of Vacuum-Decay Valleys
J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complex structure of vacuum decay in single-field potentials, revealing the existence of pseudo-bounces, antibounces, and multiple bounce configurations, which extend the traditional understanding of vacuum decay mechanisms.
Contribution
It uncovers a richer vacuum decay landscape, including pseudo-bounces and multiple bounce solutions, using combined Euclidean and tunneling potential methods.
Findings
Existence of pseudo-bounce decay configurations.
Multiple bounce solutions including antibounces.
Vacuum decay structure is more complex than traditional models.
Abstract
In the standard lore the decay of the false vacuum of a single-field potential is described by a semi-classical Euclidean bounce configuration that can be found using overshoot/undershoot algorithms, and whose action suppresses exponentially the decay rate. While this is generically correct, we show in a few concrete examples of potentials, previously studied in the literature for other purposes, that the vacuum decay structure can be far richer. In some cases there is no bounce and decay proceeds via the so-called pseudo-bounce configurations. In the general case with bounce, there are bounces, with ranging from 0 (the standard case) to . Some of these decay configurations we call antibounces as they have the wrong behavior for overshoot/undershoot algorithms, which can miss them. Bounce and antibounce configurations form pairs connected by pseudo-bounces. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtomic and Molecular Physics · Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
