Properties of slow magneto-acoustic waves observed simultaneously using Hi-C 2.1 and AIA

TL;DR

This study compares the properties of slow magneto-acoustic waves observed simultaneously by Hi-C 2.1 and AIA, finding consistent damping lengths and suggesting instrumental effects may influence measurements.

Contribution

It demonstrates that different high-resolution instruments yield similar damping length measurements for slow waves, addressing discrepancies in previous observations.

Findings

Damping lengths are approximately 3.4 to 4.1 Mm across instruments.

Oscillation periods are around 2.7 to 2.8 minutes.

Propagation speeds are about 46-48 km/s.

Abstract

Propagating slow magneto-acoustic waves are commonly observed in different coronal structures but are most prominent in active region fan loops. Their rapid damping with damping lengths of the order of a wavelength has been investigated in the past by several authors. Although different physical mechanisms have been proposed, significant discrepancies between the theory and observations remain. Recent high-resolution observations captured simultaneously by two different instruments reveal distinct damping lengths for slow magneto-acoustic waves although their passbands are similar. These results suggest a possible contribution of instrumental characteristics on the measurement of damping lengths. Here, we analyse the behavior of slow waves using a different pair of instruments in order to check the prevalence of such results. In particular, the cotemporal observations of active region NOAA AR12712 by the High-Resolution Coronal Imager (Hi-C 2.1) and the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) are utilised. The estimated oscillation periods of slow magneto-acoustic waves identified from these data are 2.7{\,}$\pm${\,}0.2{\,}min from SDO/AIA, and 2.8{\,}$\pm${\,}1.2{\,}min from Hi-C 2.1. The corresponding propagation speeds are found to be 46.0{\,}$\pm${\,}1.7{\,}km{\,}s$^{-1}$ and 48.1{\,}$\pm${\,}0.6{\,}km{\,}s$^{-1}$, respectively. Damping lengths were calculated by two different methods, the Phase Tracking Method (PTM) and the Amplitude Tracking Method (ATM). The obtained values from PTM are 4.0{\,}$\pm${\,}2.1{\,}Mm and 4.1{\,}$\pm${\,}0.3{\,}Mm while those from ATM are 3.4{\,}$\pm${\,}1.0{\,}Mm and 3.7{\,}$\pm${\,}0.1{\,}Mm, respectively, for the AIA and Hi-C data. Our results do not indicate any notable difference in damping lengths between these instruments.