Effect of Weak Measurement Reversal on Quantum Correlations in a Correlated Amplitude Damping Channel, with a Neural Network Perspective
Venkat Abhignan, Bidyut Bikash Boruah, R. Srikanth, and Ashutosh Singh

TL;DR
This paper investigates how weak measurement reversal can preserve quantum correlations in noisy channels, compares single- and two-qubit protocols, and employs neural networks to predict quantum discord from other correlations.
Contribution
It introduces a two-qubit WMR protocol for better preservation of quantum correlations and applies neural networks to analyze and predict quantum discord from other measures.
Findings
Two-qubit WMR outperforms single-qubit in preserving correlations.
Neural network accurately predicts quantum discord from other correlations.
Concurrence and EPR steering significantly influence discord prediction.
Abstract
We study the evolution of quantum correlations in Bell, Werner, and maximally entangled mixed states of two qubits subjected to correlated amplitude-damping channels. Our primary focus is to evaluate the robustness of entanglement as a resource for quantum information protocols such as dense coding, teleportation, and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering under the influence of noise. In addition, we investigate the behaviour of other quantum correlations, including quantum discord and coherence, and analyze their hierarchy under decoherence. To counteract the detrimental effects of the channels, we apply the weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal (WMR) protocol, comparing the effectiveness of single-qubit and two-qubit WMR techniques. Our results show that the two-qubit WMR protocol significantly outperforms the single-qubit approach in preserving quantum correlations.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
