Artificial Intelligence Should Genuinely Support Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making To Bridge the Translational Gap
Kacper Sokol, James Fackler, Julia E Vogt

TL;DR
This paper argues that AI in medicine should focus on supporting clinical reasoning and decision making through sociotechnical tools, addressing the translational gap caused by technology-centric approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a sociotechnical framework for AI support tools that enhance doctors' cognitive activities, emphasizing real-world clinical impact over benchmark performance.
Findings
Proposes a sociotechnical model for AI in medicine
Highlights limitations of current technology-centric AI approaches
Emphasizes real-world clinical relevance over benchmark metrics
Abstract
Artificial intelligence promises to revolutionise medicine, yet its impact remains limited because of the pervasive translational gap. We posit that the prevailing technology-centric approaches underpin this challenge, rendering such systems fundamentally incompatible with clinical practice, specifically diagnostic reasoning and decision making. Instead, we propose a novel sociotechnical conceptualisation of data-driven support tools designed to complement doctors' cognitive and epistemic activities. Crucially, it prioritises real-world impact over superhuman performance on inconsequential benchmarks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
