The Chinese Pulsar Timing Array data release I. Single pulsar noise analysis
Siyuan Chen, Heng Xu, Yanjun Guo, Bojun Wang, R. Nicolas Caballero, Jinchen Jiang, Jiangwei Xu, Zihan Xue, Kejia Lee, Jianping Yuan, Yonghua Xu, Jingbo Wang, Longfei Hao, Jintao Luo, Jinlin Han, Peng Jiang, Zhiqiang Shen, Min Wang, Na Wang, Renxin Xu, Xiangping Wu, Lei Qian

TL;DR
This paper analyzes noise characteristics of 57 pulsars observed by the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array using Bayesian methods, highlighting challenges in noise modeling due to dataset limitations and comparing results with other PTAs.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian approach to model pulsar noise, compares power-law and DMX models, and assesses consistency across software packages and with other PTAs.
Findings
Power-law models are favored over DMX for DM variations.
Covariances between noise components complicate modeling.
Results are broadly consistent with other PTA datasets.
Abstract
The Chinese Pulsar Timing Array (CPTA) has collected observations from 57 millisecond pulsars using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST) for close to three years, for the purpose of searching for gravitational waves (GWs). To robustly search for ultra-low-frequency GWs, pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) need to use models to describe the noise from the individual pulsars. We report on the results from the single pulsar noise analysis of the CPTA data release I (DR1). Conventionally, power laws in the frequency domain are used to describe pulsar red noise and dispersion measurement (DM) variations over time. Employing Bayesian methods, we found the choice of number and range of frequency bins with the highest evidence for each pulsar individually. A comparison between a dataset using DM piecewise measured (DMX) values and a power-law Gaussian process to describe the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
