Oversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizations
Chris Schmitz, Jonathan Rystr{\o}m, Jan Batzner

TL;DR
This paper examines how agentic AI systems challenge traditional public sector oversight, emphasizing the need for integrated, continuous, and cross-departmental governance to ensure responsible deployment.
Contribution
It identifies key governance dimensions for agent oversight and evaluates existing structures, proposing adaptations for public sector constraints.
Findings
Agentic AI intensifies oversight challenges
Existing oversight structures are insufficient for continuous supervision
Proposed governance adaptations improve agent oversight
Abstract
This paper finds that the introduction of agentic AI systems intensifies existing challenges to traditional public sector oversight mechanisms -- which rely on siloed compliance units and episodic approvals rather than continuous, integrated supervision. We identify five governance dimensions essential for responsible agent deployment: cross-departmental implementation, comprehensive evaluation, enhanced security protocols, operational visibility, and systematic auditing. We evaluate the capacity of existing oversight structures to meet these challenges, via a mixed-methods approach consisting of a literature review and interviews with civil servants in AI-related roles. We find that agent oversight poses intensified versions of three existing governance challenges: continuous oversight, deeper integration of governance and operational capabilities, and interdepartmental coordination.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
