FedAPM: Federated Learning via ADMM with Partial Model Personalization

TL;DR

FedAPM introduces a novel federated learning framework using ADMM with partial model personalization, effectively mitigating client drift and achieving faster, more accurate convergence across heterogeneous datasets.

Contribution

This paper proposes FedAPM, a new ADMM-based federated learning method that stabilizes partial model personalization and guarantees convergence from arbitrary initializations.

Findings

FedAPM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and convergence speed.

Achieves 12.3% higher test accuracy on average.

Requires fewer communication rounds for convergence.

Abstract

In federated learning (FL), the assumption that datasets from different devices are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) often does not hold due to user differences, and the presence of various data modalities across clients makes using a single model impractical. Personalizing certain parts of the model can effectively address these issues by allowing those parts to differ across clients, while the remaining parts serve as a shared model. However, we found that partial model personalization may exacerbate client drift (each client's local model diverges from the shared model), thereby reducing the effectiveness and efficiency of FL algorithms. We propose an FL framework based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), referred to as FedAPM, to mitigate client drift. We construct the augmented Lagrangian function by incorporating first-order and second-order proximal terms into the objective, with the second-order term providing fixed correction and the first-order term offering compensatory correction between the local and shared models. Our analysis demonstrates that FedAPM, by using explicit estimates of the Lagrange multiplier, is more stable and efficient in terms of convergence compared to other FL frameworks. We establish the global convergence of FedAPM training from arbitrary initial points to a stationary point, achieving three types of rates: constant, linear, and sublinear, under mild assumptions. We conduct experiments using four heterogeneous and multimodal datasets with different metrics to validate the performance of FedAPM. Specifically, FedAPM achieves faster and more accurate convergence, outperforming the SOTA methods with average improvements of 12.3% in test accuracy, 16.4% in F1 score, and 18.0% in AUC while requiring fewer communication rounds.