Judicial Permission
Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo
TL;DR
This paper explores the role of judicial permission in criminal trials by modeling it as a dialogue game, analyzing how different standards of proof and argumentation affect judicial decision-making.
Contribution
It introduces a novel dialogue game model to systematically analyze judicial permissions under various proof standards and argumentation semantics.
Findings
Provides a formal framework for judicial permission analysis
Highlights the impact of proof standards on judicial decisions
Offers insights into argumentation dynamics in legal contexts
Abstract
This paper examines the significance of weak permissions in criminal trials (\emph{judicial permission}). It introduces a dialogue game model to systematically address judicial permissions, considering different standards of proof and argumentation semantics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Artificial Intelligence in Law