Introducing multiverse analysis to bibliometrics: The case of team size effects on disruptive research
Christian Leibel, Lutz Bornmann

TL;DR
This paper introduces multiverse analysis to bibliometrics to improve the robustness of research findings, demonstrated through examining how team size influences research disruption, revealing that results depend heavily on model choices.
Contribution
The study pioneers applying multiverse analysis in bibliometrics to assess the robustness of research findings against various methodological choices.
Findings
Robust negative effect of team size on research disruption.
Model specification significantly influences effect size.
Multiverse analysis enhances transparency and reliability of bibliometric results.
Abstract
Although bibliometrics has become an essential tool in the evaluation of research performance, bibliometric analyses are sensitive to a range of methodological choices. Subtle choices in data selection, indicator construction, and modeling decisions can substantially alter results. Ensuring robustness (meaning that findings hold up under different reasonable scenarios) is therefore critical for credible research and research evaluation. To address this issue, this study introduces multiverse analysis to bibliometrics. Multiverse analysis is a statistical tool that enables analysts to transparently discuss modeling assumptions and thoroughly assess model robustness. Whereas standard robustness checks usually cover only a small subset of all plausible models, multiverse analysis includes all plausible models. The benefits of multiverse analysis are illustrated by assessing the robustness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
