The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: A Case Study for Simplified Dispersion Measure Modeling for PSR J1455-3330 and the Impact on Gravitational Wave Sensitivity
Michael T. Lam, David L. Kaplan, Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, Paul T. Baker, Paul R. Brook, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul B. Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Elizabeth C. Ferrara, William Fiore

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that using a simplified, physically-motivated dispersion measure model for pulsar PSR J1455-3330 significantly alters gravitational wave detection signals, emphasizing the importance of appropriate modeling in pulsar timing arrays.
Contribution
The paper advocates for physically-motivated dispersion measure modeling over piecewise-constant functions in pulsar timing, impacting gravitational wave sensitivity analysis.
Findings
Replacing the dispersion model changes the pulsar's parallax detection from an upper limit to a significant value.
Red noise becomes significant when using the simplified physical model.
The red noise aligns with the common signal observed in other pulsars.
Abstract
Evidence for a low-frequency gravitational-wave background using pulsar timing arrays has generated recent interest into its underlying contributing sources. However, multiple investigations have seen that the significance of the evidence does not change with choice of pulsar modeling techniques but the resulting parameters from the gravitational wave searches do. PSR J1455-3330 is one of the longest-observed pulsars in the array monitored by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) but showed no evidence for long-timescale red noise, either intrinsic or the common signal found among many pulsars in the array. In this work, we argue that NANOGrav's piecewise-constant function used to model variations in radio-frequency-dependent dispersive delay should not be used for this pulsar, and a much simpler physical model of a fixed solar wind density plus a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
