Computational Complexity and Simulability of Non-Hermitian Quantum Dynamics
Brian Barch, Daniel Lidar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of non-Hermitian quantum systems, showing that any potential advantage is unlikely to be scalable without implying implausible complexity-theoretic consequences.
Contribution
It introduces the NHBQP(U) model, proving its equivalence to PostBQP, and demonstrates that non-Hermiticity does not enhance classical simulability for strongly simulable systems.
Findings
NHBQP(U) equals PostBQP=PP for fixed U.
Scalable NH advantage implies implausible complexity consequences.
Non-Hermiticity does not increase computational power in strongly simulable systems.
Abstract
Non-Hermitian (NH) quantum systems demonstrate striking differences from their Hermitian counterparts, leading to claims of NH advantage in areas ranging from metrology to entanglement generation. We show that in the context of quantum computation, any such NH advantage is unlikely to be scalable as an efficient computational resource: if coherent normalized non-unitary evolution could be realized with only polynomial overhead, then the resulting model could implement postselection, implying implausibly strong complexity-theoretic power under standard assumptions. We define NHBQP(U) as the computational power of poly-size quantum circuits that, in addition to a standard universal unitary gate set, may apply a fixed gate U on qubits that is not proportional to a unitary, with the state renormalized after each use of U. We prove this model is powerful enough to decide PostBQP. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
