ROC Curves for Spatial Point Patterns and Presence-Absence Data
Adrian Baddeley, Ege Rubak, Suman Rakshit, Gopalan Nair

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the interpretation of ROC curves in spatial data analysis, connecting them to statistical tests and proposing new techniques for model evaluation, variable selection, and data analysis, with implementations in R.
Contribution
It provides a clearer understanding of ROC curves in spatial contexts and introduces novel methods extending their application for model and variable assessment.
Findings
ROC measures ranking ability, not goodness-of-fit.
AUC relates to hypothesis tests of variable effects.
New techniques support variable selection and spatial data analysis.
Abstract
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves have recently been used to evaluate the performance of models for spatial presence-absence or presence-only data. Applications include species distribution modelling and mineral prospectivity analysis. We clarify the interpretation of the ROC curve in this context. Contrary to statements in the literature, ROC does not measure goodness-of-fit of a spatial model, and its interpretation as a measure of predictive ability is weak; it is a measure of ranking ability, insensitive to the precise form of the model. To gain insight we draw connections between ROC and existing statistical techniques for spatial point pattern data. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is related to hypothesis tests of the null hypothesis that the explanatory variables have no effect. The shape of the ROC curve has a diagnostic interpretation. This suggests several new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
