Comparison of different Unique hard attention transformer models by the formal languages they can recognize
Leonid Ryvkin

TL;DR
This paper surveys the recognition capabilities of various unique hard attention transformer models, analyzing their formal language recognition power based on different configurations and theoretical bounds.
Contribution
It systematically compares UHAT models with different attention mechanisms and establishes theoretical bounds on their language recognition capabilities.
Findings
Different UHAT configurations have varying recognition powers.
The models are characterized by bounds in logic and circuit complexity.
The survey clarifies the relationships between model types and their formal language classes.
Abstract
This note is a survey of various results on the capabilities of unique hard attention transformers encoders (UHATs) to recognize formal languages. We distinguish between masked vs. non-masked, finite vs. infinite image and general vs. bilinear attention score functions. We recall some relations between these models, as well as a lower bound in terms of first-order logic and an upper bound in terms of circuit complexity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
MethodsSoftmax · Attention Is All You Need
