The Surprising Irrelevance of Total-Value-Locked on Cryptocurrency Returns
Matt Brigida

TL;DR
This paper challenges the assumption that total-value-locked (TVL) directly influences cryptocurrency returns by showing that TVL-based portfolios' returns are explained by overall crypto market factors, making TVL strategies redundant.
Contribution
It demonstrates that TVL does not provide unique predictive power for crypto returns beyond standard market factors, using empirical analysis of TVL-sorted portfolios.
Findings
TVL portfolios' returns are linear functions of market returns
TVL strategies can be replicated with market portfolios
Results hold for both total and adjusted TVL measures
Abstract
A common assumption in cryptocurrency markets is a positive relationship between total-value-locked (TVL) and cryptocurrency returns. To test this hypothesis we examine whether the returns of TVL-sorted portfolios can be explained by common cryptocurrency factors. We find evidence that portfolios formed on TVL exhibit returns that are linear functions of aggregate crypto market returns, that is they can be replicated with appropriate weights on the crypto market portfolio. Thus, strategies based on TVL can be priced with standard asset pricing tools. This result holds true both for total TVL and a simple TVL measure that removes a number of ways TVL may be overstated.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
