Design Didn't Prevent These Hazard Exposures
David. E Mertz (1) ((1) Fermilab)

TL;DR
This paper examines how equipment design influences electrical workers' safety practices, highlighting design flaws that lead to hazards and proposing improvements to promote compliance with safety standards.
Contribution
It identifies specific design features that encourage unsafe work behaviors and suggests design-stage processes to enhance safety compliance.
Findings
Design flaws contributed to hazardous work actions.
Equipment improvements facilitated safer practices.
Design processes can proactively identify safety-promoting features.
Abstract
Two recent electrical incidents demonstrate how the design of equipment encouraged electrical workers to take actions that violated NFPA 70E principles. The features that encouraged non-compliant work execution will be described, as well as how the equipment was improved to facilitate safe work practices. Design-stage processes that help identify features that will foster rather than compromise safe work practices will be identified as well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectrical Fault Detection and Protection · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Ocular and Laser Science Research
