The Onset of Feedback in Abell 1885: Evidence for Large-Scale Quenching Despite a Young Central AGN

TL;DR

This study uses Chandra and multi-wavelength data to investigate AGN feedback in Abell 1885, revealing large-scale quenching of cooling despite a young, actively accreting black hole, suggesting different timescales for small-scale feeding and large-scale energy dissipation.

Contribution

It provides evidence for a decoupling of small-scale black hole feeding and large-scale intracluster medium heating, proposing distinct timescales for AGN feedback processes in galaxy clusters.

Findings

Cooling is highly suppressed on large scales despite active black hole accretion.

Large-scale energy dissipation occurs over longer timescales than black hole feeding.

The feedback process involves lingering heating effects long after initial outbursts.

Abstract

We present a new 8.5 ks Chandra observation of Abell 1885, obtained as part of the Cluster Evolution Reference Ensemble At Low-z (CEREAL) survey of ~200 low-z galaxy groups and clusters. These data reveal that Abell 1885 is a strong cool core, with a central cooling time of 0.43 Gyr, and that the central galaxy hosts an X-ray luminous point source at its center (L=2.3x10^42 erg/s), indicative of a rapidly accreting supermassive black hole. In the context of the larger CEREAL sample, we constrain the fraction of clusters at z~0.15 with X-ray bright central AGN to be no more than 4.1%. Including radio data from LOFAR, GMRT, ASKAP, and the VLA and optical integral field unit data from SDSS MaNGA, we probe the details of cooling, feeding, and feedback in this system. These data reveal that cooling of the intracluster medium is highly suppressed on large (>10 kpc) scales despite a central supermassive black hole that is in the early stages of the self-regulation cycle (characterized by rapid accretion, physically small jets, and no large-scale low-frequency radio emission). To reconcile the large-scale quenching with a lack of visible large-scale feedback, we propose that the timescale on which energy is dissipated on large scales is significantly longer than the timescale on which black hole feeding operates on small (~pc) scales. These observations suggest that there are two separate timescales characterizing AGN feedback in clusters: the short timescale of small-scale feeding and feedback processes and a longer timescale by which energy is dissipated on large physical scales in the intracluster medium. This interpretation disfavors a model in which the energy is rapidly dissipated (e.g. shocks), which would synchronize the feeding and feedback timescales, and favors a model in which the heating effects of AGN feedback can linger long after the outburst has passed (e.g. turbulent mixing).