Designing Algorithmic Delegates: The Role of Indistinguishability in Human-AI Handoff
Sophie Greenwood, Karen Levy, Solon Barocas, Hoda Heidari, and Jon Kleinberg

TL;DR
This paper explores how to design optimal AI delegates that consider human categorization of instances, revealing complex, computationally hard problems but also providing efficient solutions and practical insights through simulations.
Contribution
It introduces the problem of designing optimal algorithmic delegates with categorization, demonstrating its complexity and providing algorithms for key cases.
Findings
Optimal delegates can outperform standalone algorithms.
Designing optimal delegates is computationally hard in general.
Efficient algorithms exist for certain decomposable cases.
Abstract
As AI technologies improve, people are increasingly willing to delegate tasks to AI agents. In many cases, the human decision-maker chooses whether to delegate to an AI agent based on properties of the specific instance of the decision-making problem they are facing. Since humans typically lack full awareness of all the factors relevant to this choice for a given decision-making instance, they perform a kind of categorization by treating indistinguishable instances -- those that have the same observable features -- as the same. In this paper, we define the problem of designing the optimal algorithmic delegate in the presence of categories. This is an important dimension in the design of algorithms to work with humans, since we show that the optimal delegate can be an arbitrarily better teammate than the optimal standalone algorithmic agent. The solution to this optimal delegation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
