Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments
Andrew Huang, Yael Tauman Kalai

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that parallel repetition exponentially reduces soundness error in post-quantum public-coin interactive arguments, including threshold verifiers, with simplified analysis for classical verifiers.
Contribution
It extends parallel repetition results to post-quantum settings for public-coin and threshold verifiers, with a simplified approach for classical verifiers.
Findings
Parallel repetition reduces soundness error exponentially in post-quantum settings.
Results apply to threshold verifiers accepting if a certain number of executions succeed.
Simplified analysis for protocols with classical verifiers compared to quantum protocol settings.
Abstract
In this work, we show that parallel repetition of public-coin interactive arguments reduces the soundness error at an exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least of the executions are accepted (for some threshold ). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical. We also prove a similar result for three-message private-coin arguments. Previously, Bostanci, Qian, Spooner, and Yuen (STOC 2024) proved such a parallel repetition result in the more general setting of quantum protocols, where the verifier and communication may be quantum. We consider only protocols where the verifier is classical, but obtain a simplified analysis, and for the more general setting of threshold verifiers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
