Assumption-free stability for ranking problems
Ruiting Liang, Jake A. Soloff, Rina Foygel Barber, Rebecca Willett

TL;DR
This paper introduces assumption-free stability methods for ranking problems, ensuring stable rankings without relying on data separation assumptions, and demonstrates their effectiveness on real-world data.
Contribution
The paper develops a new stability framework and proposes two novel ranking operators that guarantee stability without data distribution assumptions.
Findings
Methods provide guaranteed stability in ranking tasks.
Algorithms work without assumptions on data distribution.
Experiments show stable and informative rankings.
Abstract
In this work, we consider ranking problems among a finite set of candidates: for instance, selecting the top- items among a larger list of candidates or obtaining the full ranking of all items in the set. These problems are often unstable, in the sense that estimating a ranking from noisy data can exhibit high sensitivity to small perturbations. Concretely, if we use data to provide a score for each item (say, by aggregating preference data over a sample of users), then for two items with similar scores, small fluctuations in the data can alter the relative ranking of those items. Many existing theoretical results for ranking problems assume a separation condition to avoid this challenge, but real-world data often contains items whose scores are approximately tied, limiting the applicability of existing theory. To address this gap, we develop a new algorithmic stability framework for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making · Game Theory and Voting Systems
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
