Predicting Blood Type: Assessing Model Performance with ROC Analysis
Malik A. Altayar, Muhyeeddin Alqaraleh, Mowafaq Salem Alzboon, Wesam T. Almagharbeh

TL;DR
This study examines the potential correlation between fingerprint patterns and blood groups, finding no significant association, and discusses implications for forensic identification and future research directions.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of fingerprint and blood group data, highlighting the independence of these traits and suggesting future research with larger samples and machine learning methods.
Findings
No significant correlation between fingerprint patterns and blood groups
Loops are the most common fingerprint pattern among participants
Blood group O+ is the most prevalent in the sample
Abstract
Introduction: Personal identification is a critical aspect of forensic sciences, security, and healthcare. While conventional biometrics systems such as DNA profiling and iris scanning offer high accuracy, they are time-consuming and costly. Objectives: This study investigates the relationship between fingerprint patterns and ABO blood group classification to explore potential correlations between these two traits. Methods: The study analyzed 200 individuals, categorizing their fingerprints into three types: loops, whorls, and arches. Blood group classification was also recorded. Statistical analysis, including chi-square and Pearson correlation tests, was used to assess associations between fingerprint patterns and blood groups. Results: Loops were the most common fingerprint pattern, while blood group O+ was the most prevalent among the participants. Statistical analysis revealed no…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
