
TL;DR
This paper develops effective versions of strong measure zero sets across various complexity levels, introduces new characterizations, and explores their properties in computability and algorithmic contexts.
Contribution
It introduces effective definitions of strong measure zero using odds supermartingales and provides a detailed analysis across classical, bounded, and computable frameworks.
Findings
Borel's conjecture holds in the bounded setting but not in the computable setting.
The paper characterizes computable strong measure zero sets within the hyperarithmetical hierarchy.
An algorithmic version of strong measure zero is shown to be equivalent to NCR reals.
Abstract
Effective versions of strong measure zero sets are developed for various levels of complexity and computability. It is shown that the sets can be equivalently defined using a generalization of supermartingales called odds supermartingales, success rates on supermartingales, predictors, and coverings. We show Borel's conjecture of a set having strong measure zero if and only if it is countable holds in the time and space bounded setting. At the level of computability this does not hold. We show the computable level contains sequences at arbitrary levels of the hyperarithmetical hierarchy by proving a correspondence principle yielding a condition for the sets of computable strong measure zero to agree with the classical sets of strong measure zero. An algorithmic version of strong measure zero using lower semicomputability is defined. We show that this notion is equivalent to the set of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
