Datasheets Aren't Enough: DataRubrics for Automated Quality Metrics and Accountability

TL;DR

This paper introduces DataRubrics, a structured, rubric-based framework leveraging LLMs for standardized, scalable evaluation of dataset quality, addressing limitations of existing transparency tools and promoting higher standards in data-centric research.

Contribution

It proposes DataRubrics, a novel, reproducible framework for assessing dataset quality using LLMs, enhancing transparency, consistency, and scalability in dataset review processes.

Findings

DataRubrics enables reproducible dataset quality assessment.

LLM-based evaluation improves scalability and consistency.

Code for DataRubrics is publicly available.

Abstract

High-quality datasets are fundamental to training and evaluating machine learning models, yet their creation-especially with accurate human annotations-remains a significant challenge. Many dataset paper submissions lack originality, diversity, or rigorous quality control, and these shortcomings are often overlooked during peer review. Submissions also frequently omit essential details about dataset construction and properties. While existing tools such as datasheets aim to promote transparency, they are largely descriptive and do not provide standardized, measurable methods for evaluating data quality. Similarly, metadata requirements at conferences promote accountability but are inconsistently enforced. To address these limitations, this position paper advocates for the integration of systematic, rubric-based evaluation metrics into the dataset review process-particularly as submission volumes continue to grow. We also explore scalable, cost-effective methods for synthetic data generation, including dedicated tools and LLM-as-a-judge approaches, to support more efficient evaluation. As a call to action, we introduce DataRubrics, a structured framework for assessing the quality of both human- and model-generated datasets. Leveraging recent advances in LLM-based evaluation, DataRubrics offers a reproducible, scalable, and actionable solution for dataset quality assessment, enabling both authors and reviewers to uphold higher standards in data-centric research. We also release code to support reproducibility of LLM-based evaluations at https://github.com/datarubrics/datarubrics.