Challenges in designing research infrastructure software in multi-stakeholder contexts
Stephan Druskat, Sabine Theis

TL;DR
This paper explores the challenges of designing research infrastructure software in multi-stakeholder environments, highlighting differing priorities and requirements among user groups and emphasizing the need for adaptable, user-friendly systems.
Contribution
It identifies key challenges and stakeholder differences in research infrastructure software design, providing insights for creating more inclusive and effective systems.
Findings
RSEs prioritize infrastructure compatibility
IFs focus on usability and documentation
Only half of RSEs actively publish software
Abstract
This study investigates the challenges in designing research infrastructure software for automated software publication in multi-stakeholder environments, focusing specifically on the HERMES system. Through two quantitative surveys of research software engineers (RSEs) and infrastructure facility staff (IFs), it examines technical, organizational, and social requirements across these stakeholder groups. The study reveals significant differences in how RSEs and IFs prioritize various system features. While RSEs highly value compatibility with existing infrastructure, IFs prioritize user-focused aspects like system usability and documentation. The research identifies two main challenges in designing research infrastructure software: (1) the existence of multiple stakeholder groups with differing requirements, and (2) the internal heterogeneity within each stakeholder group across…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
