FourierFlow: Frequency-aware Flow Matching for Generative Turbulence Modeling
Haixin Wang, Jiashu Pan, Hao Wu, Fan Zhang, Tailin Wu

TL;DR
FourierFlow is a novel frequency-aware generative model for turbulence simulation that effectively mitigates spectral bias and noise, demonstrating superior performance and generalization in complex turbulent flow scenarios.
Contribution
FourierFlow introduces a dual-branch architecture with frequency-guided Fourier mixing and high-frequency pre-training to improve turbulence modeling.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art methods in turbulent flow scenarios
Exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution and noisy inputs
Effective in long-term temporal extrapolation
Abstract
Modeling complex fluid systems, especially turbulence governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), remains a fundamental challenge in science and engineering. Recently, diffusion-based generative models have gained attention as a powerful approach for these tasks, owing to their capacity to capture long-range dependencies and recover hierarchical structures. However, we present both empirical and theoretical evidence showing that generative models struggle with significant spectral bias and common-mode noise when generating high-fidelity turbulent flows. Here we propose FourierFlow, a novel generative turbulence modeling framework that enhances the frequency-aware learning by both implicitly and explicitly mitigating spectral bias and common-mode noise. FourierFlow comprises three key innovations. Firstly, we adopt a dual-branch backbone architecture, consisting of a salient flow…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
+ The paper suggests a new architecture for flow matching (FM) based generation of solutions to the Navier Stokes equation + The numerical evaluation gives visually decent results and the comparison with a large number of other operator learning frameworks shows mostly superior results. + The code will be released in the case of acceptance making the results reproducible
My main criticism against the paper is the way it is prepared. It absolutely lacks precision and puts wordy descriptions in the place of clear scientific arguments supported by facts. To give some examples: There are words like "external representation space" in the section 3.3 where the meaning is never explained, in the context of physics the authors speak about "semantically meaningful [...] features" or the "common mode signal" which's Wikipaedia definition is clearly (completely) out of con
- The paper is well written and experiments as well as appendix seem polished and extensive. - Tackles a meaningful problem: high-frequency fidelity is crucial in turbulence modelling. - Methodology is presented concisely and sound. - Each component is motivated empirically through an ablation study. - Provided code for reproducibility.
My main critique for the proposed method is the motivation and argumentation for the addition of three previously proposed components. Intuitively I understand the problem of high frequency features. However, the actual arguments and motivations for specific components of the proposed method remain a bit inprecise to me. They mix arguments against diffusion models with arguments for some general components: - Empirical spectral bias: It seems to me like your approach now fits lower frequency f
The paper presents the first formal spectral-bias analysis of diffusion and flow-matching models in the context of physical PDEs.
Limited Physical Grounding Beyond Frequency Domain Heavy Reliance on Learned Frequency Priors Computational and Memory Overhead Conceptual Ambiguity: Frequency is not from Physics, it is hidden
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
