Generalization in VAE and Diffusion Models: A Unified Information-Theoretic Analysis
Qi Chen, Jierui Zhu, Florian Shkurti

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified information-theoretic framework to analyze and guarantee the generalization of VAEs and Diffusion Models, addressing theoretical gaps and providing practical bounds for model selection.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive theoretical analysis of generalization in VAEs and DMs, incorporating shared encoder-generator structures and enabling data-driven model optimization.
Findings
Provides explicit generalization bounds for VAEs and DMs.
Identifies a trade-off in diffusion time T affecting generalization.
Empirical validation on synthetic and real datasets supports the theory.
Abstract
Despite the empirical success of Diffusion Models (DMs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), their generalization performance remains theoretically underexplored, especially lacking a full consideration of the shared encoder-generator structure. Leveraging recent information-theoretic tools, we propose a unified theoretical framework that provides guarantees for the generalization of both the encoder and generator by treating them as randomized mappings. This framework further enables (1) a refined analysis for VAEs, accounting for the generator's generalization, which was previously overlooked; (2) illustrating an explicit trade-off in generalization terms for DMs that depends on the diffusion time ; and (3) providing computable bounds for DMs based solely on the training data, allowing the selection of the optimal and the integration of such bounds into the optimization process…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
- The authors address the critical topic of generalization in generative models, and provide estimable bounds for both the encoder and the generator in VAEs. - Bounds for VAEs avoid Wasserstein distance and impose milder assumptions (bounded to sub-Gaussian). - Bounds for DMs overcome the challenges associated with KL-divergence's non-satisfaction of the triangle inequality, and contribute to a clearer understanding of diffusion time’s role in generalization and model performance.
- In line 98, the paper asserts that the bounds for the encoder are tighter, yet this claim lacks sufficient detail. Although some comparisons to previous bounds are made in line 324, there remains a need for a more explicit, quantitative analysis to illustrate the improvements over existing bounds. Adding a direct comparison or detailed quantitative analysis would make the claim more substantiated and provide clearer evidence of the improvement. - The proposed generalization bounds do not clear
- This paper derives a generalization bound for encoder-generator architectures under the relatively mild assumption of sub-Gaussian loss functions. As noted in lines 286-291, the paper provides an intuitive explanation of these bounds and a convincing discussion of the trade-offs involved. - Corollaries 4.2 and 4.3 extend the analysis to evaluate the Wasserstein distance and KL divergence between the generative model's distribution and the data distribution, offering valuable tools for the theo
While the results are significant in terms of learning theory by considering the effects of both the encoder and generator, some areas could be further improved: - Although challenging, the analysis does not incorporate the complexity of the learning models. Including bounds related to the complexity of simple neural networks or linear models could strengthen the work. - Aside from the theoretical analysis provided by the generalization bound, it would be beneficial to relate these results to th
This paper provides a very detailed and comprehensive information-theoretic analysis of generalization in VAEs and DMs along with experiments that empirically validate it. In particular, the incorporation of encoder-decoder / forward-reverse process into the analysis provides a novel view into their impact on the generative models' generalization behaviour, such as the finding that longer diffusion steps do not necessarily result in better estimates in DMs.
The paper's writing made it difficult to process the main contributions to the paper for two main reasons: (1) Despite the abstract suggesting that the VAE's generalization behaviour is studied, much of the paper's focus is on analyzing DM behaviour. (2) There is notably no experiments that validate VAE behaviour, which suggests that the VAE is studied here as a precursor to understanding the generalization behaviour of DMs.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsEnergy Load and Power Forecasting · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
