Decoupling Reasoning and Knowledge Injection for In-Context Knowledge Editing
Changyue Wang, Weihang Su, Qingyao Ai, Yujia Zhou, Yiqun Liu

TL;DR
DecKER introduces a novel in-context knowledge editing framework that separates reasoning from knowledge updates, improving multi-hop question answering performance by reducing conflicts and maintaining reasoning consistency.
Contribution
It proposes DecKER, a new ICE method that decouples reasoning from knowledge injection using masked reasoning paths and hybrid retrieval, enhancing editing effectiveness.
Findings
DecKER outperforms existing ICE methods on multi-hop QA benchmarks.
DecKER reduces conflicts between external knowledge and internal reasoning.
DecKER maintains reasoning consistency after knowledge edits.
Abstract
Knowledge editing aims to efficiently update Large Language Models (LLMs) by modifying specific knowledge without retraining the entire model. Among knowledge editing approaches, in-context editing (ICE) offers a lightweight solution by injecting new knowledge directly into the input context, leaving model parameters unchanged. However, existing ICE approaches do not explicitly separate the newly injected knowledge from the model's original reasoning process. This entanglement often results in conflicts between external updates and internal parametric knowledge, undermining the consistency and accuracy of the reasoning path.In this work, we conduct preliminary experiments to examine how parametric knowledge influences reasoning path planning. We find that the model's reasoning is tightly coupled with its internal knowledge, and that naively injecting new information without adapting the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Stream Mining Techniques
