Pluto Geologic Map: Use of Crater Data to Understand Age Relationships
Kelsi N. Singer, Oliver L. White, Sarah Greenstreet, Jeffrey M. Moore, David A. Williams, and Rosaly M. C. Lopes

TL;DR
This study uses crater data and a new visualization method to analyze Pluto's surface ages, revealing a range of geologic units from young, resurfaced terrains to ancient, cratered regions, despite uncertainties in impactor flux.
Contribution
It introduces a novel distributed R-plot visualization and applies crater analysis to determine relative and quantitative ages of Pluto's geologic units.
Findings
Large areas of young, crater-free terrains indicate recent resurfacing.
Crater analysis provides relative and quantitative age estimates despite flux uncertainties.
Variety of surface morphologies suggests diverse resurfacing processes.
Abstract
Pluto's surface displays a wide variety of geologic units from smooth plains to extremely rugged mountainous expanses. These terrains range in age from young, actively resurfaced regions (no observable craters even in the highest-resolution New Horizons images) to old, heavily cratered, eroded regions. Here we expand upon the crater data analysis and the independent crater data set used in the production of a 1:7M scale geologic map of Pluto that is to be published by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS). We present both relative ages based on crater spatial density (number of craters in a given size bin per km^2) and also quantitative ages (e.g., 2 Ga) using the estimated impactor flux onto Pluto. The techniques presented here were developed specifically for the information available from a USGS geologic map, where smaller craters are mapped as points only (no specific diameter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
