Transporting results from a trial to an external target population when trial participation impacts adherence
Rachael K. Ross, Ivan Diaz, Amy J. Pitts, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Kara E. Rudolph

TL;DR
This paper develops a sensitivity analysis method to estimate how trial results generalize to real-world populations when trial activities influence treatment adherence, which affects outcome generalizability.
Contribution
It introduces a novel sensitivity analysis framework and estimators that account for adherence differences, enabling better external validity of trial findings.
Findings
Proposed a parameter for adherence difference to assess impact on outcomes.
Developed double robust estimators supporting machine learning.
Applied method to opioid use disorder trial data.
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard for informing treatment guidelines, but results may not generalize to real-world populations. Generalizability is hindered by distributional differences in baseline covariates and treatment-outcome mediators. Approaches to address differences in covariates are well established, but approaches to address differences in mediators are more limited. Here we consider the setting where trial activities that differ from usual care settings (e.g., monetary compensation, follow-up visits frequency) affect treatment adherence. When treatment and adherence data are unavailable for the real-world target population, we cannot identify the mean outcome under a specific treatment assignment (i.e., mean potential outcome) in the target. Therefore, we propose a sensitivity analysis in which a parameter for the relative difference in adherence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
