Risks of AI-driven product development and strategies for their mitigation
Jan G\"opfert, Jann M. Weinand, Patrick Kuckertz, Noah Pflugradt, Jochen Lin{\ss}en

TL;DR
This paper discusses the potential risks associated with AI-driven product development and proposes principles for safer implementation emphasizing oversight, accountability, and explainability.
Contribution
It introduces a set of safety principles and risk assessment frameworks for mitigating technical and sociotechnical risks in AI-driven product development.
Findings
Identifies key technical and sociotechnical risks
Proposes safety principles for AI-driven development
Highlights importance of human oversight and accountability
Abstract
Humanity is progressing towards automated product development, a trend that promises faster creation of better products and thus the acceleration of technological progress. However, increasing reliance on non-human agents for this process introduces many risks. This perspective aims to initiate a discussion on these risks and appropriate mitigation strategies. To this end, we outline a set of principles for safer AI-driven product development which emphasize human oversight, accountability, and explainable design, among others. The risk assessment covers both technical risks which affect product quality and safety, and sociotechnical risks which affect society. While AI-driven product development is still in its early stages, this discussion will help balance its opportunities and risks without delaying essential progress in understanding, norm-setting, and regulation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Assessment and Management · Digital Transformation in Industry
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
