TL;DR
This paper introduces a new dataset of historical maps of France spanning four centuries, and benchmarks different deep learning approaches for long-term land cover segmentation with limited annotations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive dataset for long-term land use analysis and evaluates supervised and weakly-supervised segmentation methods on complex historical maps.
Findings
Weakly-supervised models perform comparably to fully-supervised ones.
Image translation helps bridge stylistic gaps in historical map segmentation.
The dataset reveals challenges like stylistic inconsistencies and landscape changes.
Abstract
Historical maps offer an invaluable perspective into territory evolution across past centuries--long before satellite or remote sensing technologies existed. Deep learning methods have shown promising results in segmenting historical maps, but publicly available datasets typically focus on a single map type or period, require extensive and costly annotations, and are not suited for nationwide, long-term analyses. In this paper, we introduce a new dataset of historical maps tailored for analyzing large-scale, long-term land use and land cover evolution with limited annotations. Spanning metropolitan France (548,305 km^2), our dataset contains three map collections from the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. We provide both comprehensive modern labels and 22,878 km^2 of manually annotated historical labels for the 18th and 19th century maps. Our dataset illustrates the complexity of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocus
