TL;DR
This paper introduces a new theoretical framework and a message passing scheme for temporal graph neural networks that better capture causal topology influenced by the arrow of time.
Contribution
It develops a temporal generalization of the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm and a message passing scheme based on event graph representations.
Findings
The approach effectively distinguishes non-isomorphic temporal graphs.
The message passing scheme performs well in classification tasks.
Theoretical analysis highlights advantages over existing methods.
Abstract
An important characteristic of temporal graphs is how the directed arrow of time influences their causal topology, i.e., which nodes can possibly influence each other causally via time-respecting paths. The resulting patterns are often neglected by temporal graph neural networks (TGNNs). To formally analyze the expressive power of TGNNs, we lack a generalization of graph isomorphism to temporal graphs that fully captures their causal topology. Addressing this gap, we introduce the notion of consistent event graph isomorphism, which utilizes a time-unfolded representation of time-respecting paths in temporal graphs. We compare this definition with existing notions of temporal graph isomorphisms. We illustrate and highlight the advantages of our approach and develop a temporal generalization of the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm to heuristically distinguish non-isomorphic temporal graphs.…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
* Overall well-written and easy to follow * Addresses a relevant theoretical problem in GNNs, i.e., the analysis of temporal graph models.
Below, I list my most pressing concerns with this work, which I believe would require major modifications to the manuscript. * Limited technical novelty. Isomorphism on temporal graphs has been previously studied in the GNN literature and the technical developments (c.f., proofs) in this work appear fairly straightforward. * The manuscript provides a weak and sometimes imprecise account of prior literature. In the abstract, authors state “we lack a generalization of graph isomorphism to tempor
- The paper addresses an interesting problem of temporal graph classification, which appears to have limited past exploration. - The paper is generally clearly written and logically organized. - The paper has a satisfying structure of theoretically motivating the proposed method. - Regarding reproducibility, the experiment setup appears to be described in good detail in Appendix E. It is stated that code would be provided upon acceptance.
- The diversity of datasets is limited. This may be because the paper only focuses on temporal graph classification, and does not include node classification or edge prediction/classification, as the authors note. The paper would be strengthened if the authors either expand their focus, or provide more examples applications of temporal graph classification to justify its importance. - Further, on datasets, the datasets don't seem to be described in either the main paper of the appendix. What is
I appreciate the theoretical investigation of temporal graph isomorphism by the authors.
1. The term causality is used loosely throughout the paper. 2. Relevant prior art is not cited. For example, the idea of counterfactual testing through shuffled timestamps for temporal interaction graphs was introduced in `[R1]`. The authors have cited Pritam et al. (available on arXiv since February 2025), while the full version of `[R1]` is available online on [OpenReview](https://openreview.net/forum?id=k3LAIS5wTY) since October 2024 3. The causal model underlying the temporal interaction gr
Overall, I liked the novel graph isomorphism formulation introduced in this work and focusing on aspects currently under-explored in the literature, i.e. time-respecting paths. The strengths of the paper is listed as follows. However, there are some weaknesses in this work (see next Section) and thus I am currently more neutral on the work, leaning weak accept. - **a novel graph isomorphism for temporal graphs**. The authors proposed a novel temporal generalisation of graph isomorphism called
- **lack of TGNN baselines**. As the authors also pointed out, there is a lack of comparison to other TGNN architectures. This makes the empirical evaluation limited. While it is true that many TGNNs are designed for link prediction, recently there are also a number of papers focusing on graph tasks on temporal graphs. Here are some examples [1], [2], [3]. Comparing with SOTA graph task architectures on large real world datasets can better demonstrate the significance of the proposed architectur
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
