Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios
Ayush Jha, Abootaleb Shirvani, Ali Jaffri, Svetlozar T. Rachev, Frank J. Fabozzi

TL;DR
This paper develops a dynamic, regime-aware momentum strategy incorporating ESG sentiment and tail-risk metrics, revealing that ESG-loser portfolios outperform winners in pro-ESG regimes due to market overreactions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel state-dependent momentum framework integrating ESG regimes with tail-risk-adjusted metrics, enhancing portfolio performance in turbulent markets.
Findings
ESG-loser portfolios outperform winners in pro-ESG regimes.
Market overreaction to ESG sentiment causes short-term inefficiencies.
Framework is effective across equities and cryptocurrencies.
Abstract
This paper introduces a state-dependent momentum framework that integrates ESG regime switching with tail-risk-aware reward-risk metrics. Using a dynamic programming approach and solving a finite-horizon Bellman equation, we construct long-short momentum portfolios that adjust to changing ESG sentiment regimes. Unlike traditional momentum strategies based on historical returns, our approach incorporates the Stable Tail Adjusted Return ratio and Rachev ratio to better capture downside risk in turbulent markets. We apply this framework across three asset classes, Russell 3000 equities, Dow Jones~30 stocks, and cryptocurrencies, under both pro- and anti-ESG market regimes. We find that ESG-loser portfolios significantly outperform ESG-winner portfolios in pro-ESG regimes, a counterintuitive result suggesting that market overreaction to ESG sentiment creates short-term pricing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSustainability and Climate Change Governance
