On the Physical Untenability of the Standard Notion of Quantum State
Christian de Ronde

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the concept of quantum state in standard quantum mechanics, revealing deep inconsistencies and arguing that the notion is fundamentally untenable for rational scientific understanding.
Contribution
It exposes the contradictions among various definitions of quantum state in the axiomatic framework and discusses their implications for the foundations of physics.
Findings
Identifies inconsistencies in quantum state definitions
Highlights uncritical acceptance in literature
Argues for the untenability of the quantum state concept
Abstract
The notion of quantum state plays a fundamental role within the Standard account of Quantum Mechanics (SQM) as established by Dirac and von Neumann during 1930s and up to the present. In this work we expose the deep inconsistencies that exist within the multiple definitions of the notion of quantum state that are provided within this axiomatic formulation. As we will argue, these different inconsistent definitions continue to be -- even today -- uncritically confused within the mainstream physical and philosophical literature leading to self-contradictory statements and wrong conclusions. We end with a discussion regarding the untenability of this concept for any rational understanding of theoretical physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
