TL;DR
This paper introduces two novel ordinal regression models for meta-analysis of test accuracy data across thresholds, outperforming existing methods especially with many categories and missing data.
Contribution
The authors propose flexible ordinal-bivariate and ordinal-HSROC models using an induced-Dirichlet framework, enabling threshold-specific estimates and improved performance over prior models.
Findings
Proposed models outperform existing approaches in simulation studies.
Models maintain accuracy even with many ordinal categories and missing data.
Implementation available in the MetaOrdDTA R package.
Abstract
Standard (network) meta-analysis methods for medical test accuracy evaluation analyse the data separately for each test threshold - wasting data - unless every study reports all thresholds. Previously proposed "multiple threshold" models either fail to provide threshold-specific summary estimates, or they assume that ordinal tests (e.g., questionnaires) are continuous. We propose two ordinal regression models - ordinal-bivariate and ordinal-HSROC - using an induced-Dirichlet framework for cutpoint parameters, enabling intuitive priors and both fixed-effects and random-effects cutpoints. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of our proposed models, with the simulated data being based on real anxiety screening data spanning 7, 22, and 64 ordinal categories, with 15%, 40% and 55% missing threshold data. Our proposed ordinal-bivariate model with fixed-effect…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
