Case-Based Reasoning Enhances the Predictive Power of LLMs in Drug-Drug Interaction
Guangyi Liu, Yongqi Zhang, Xunyuan Liu, Quanming Yao

TL;DR
This paper introduces CBR-DDI, a novel framework that combines case-based reasoning with large language models and graph neural networks to significantly improve drug-drug interaction prediction accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents a new CBR-based framework that distills pharmacological knowledge from historical cases to enhance LLM reasoning in DDI prediction, achieving state-of-the-art results.
Findings
28.7% accuracy improvement over baseline models
Effective retrieval and reuse of relevant cases in DDI prediction
Maintains high interpretability and flexibility
Abstract
Drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction is critical for treatment safety. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in pharmaceutical tasks, their effectiveness in DDI prediction remains challenging. Inspired by the well-established clinical practice where physicians routinely reference similar historical cases to guide their decisions through case-based reasoning (CBR), we propose CBR-DDI, a novel framework that distills pharmacological principles from historical cases to improve LLM reasoning for DDI tasks. CBR-DDI constructs a knowledge repository by leveraging LLMs to extract pharmacological insights and graph neural networks (GNNs) to model drug associations. A hybrid retrieval mechanism and dual-layer knowledge-enhanced prompting allow LLMs to effectively retrieve and reuse relevant cases. We further introduce a representative sampling strategy for dynamic case refinement.…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- This work proposes a very effective solution for an important and impactful problem (drug drug interaction prediction) - The paper is clearly written and easy to follow - The authors run extensive ablations to study the impact of each of the components.
- The major weakness of this work is its relevance for a machine learning conference like ICLR. The approach is elegant and outperforms baselines on that particular problem. However, there is no substantial machine learning contributions. That said the paper is really creative way to solve the drug-drug interaction problem and might better shine in a venue more focused on that particular problem. - The architecture of CBR-DDI is highly tailored to the drug drug interaction problem and it's not
1. The paper is well-structured and easy to follow, allowing readers to quickly grasp the content even without prior specialized knowledge. 2. The methodology is rigorous, incorporating research and refinements across multiple aspects including knowledge base construction, data retrieval, and knowledge enhancement. 3. The experiments are comprehensive, featuring not only comparisons with baseline models but also ablative studies evaluating the proposed method itself.
1. The paper does not consider the structural information of the drugs themselves, such as the graph structures of molecular or protein-based drugs, relying instead on textual information and interaction relationships. 2. The study does not incorporate expert evaluation to validate the practical effectiveness of the proposed method. 3. Both drug descriptions and mechanism insights rely on large language models (LLMs). During inference, the LLM needs to generate three components: drug description
**Strong points:** - The authors benchmarked the approach against a suite of many diverse approaches. I really applaud the authors for choosing benchmarks from both graph-based and LM-based approaches. - Section 3.3.1: The approach here which balances semantic and structural similarity is very clever and sensible with respect to the task at hand. - Well done to the authors for adjusting the metrics appropriately based on the nature of each dataset (DrugBank and TWOSIDES)- it shows that the autho
**Weak points** - Sections 3.2 and 3.3.2: Why use an LLM to generate drug descriptions or mechanism insights? Such descriptions are available on professionally curated databases (e.g., https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00945 or https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Aspirin). LLMs are infamous for hallucinations and mistakes in scientific disciplines. Thus, I would argue that this step, alone, needs to be validated before proceeding with the whole pipeline. For example, the authors ask the LLM
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Topic Modeling · Machine Learning in Healthcare
