CHEX-MATE: The Impact of Triaxiality and Orientation on Planck SZ Cluster Selection and Weak Lensing Mass Measurements
H. Saxena, J. Sayers, A. Gavidia, J.B. Melin, E.T. Lau, J. Kim, L. Chappuis, D. Eckert, S. Ettori, M. Gaspari, F. Gastaldello, S. Kay, L. Lovisari, F. Oppizzi, M.D. Petris, G.W. Pratt, E. Pointecouteau, E. Rasia, M. Rossetti, M. Sereno

TL;DR
This paper investigates how triaxiality and orientation of galaxy clusters affect their detection in Planck SZ surveys and the resulting weak lensing mass biases, highlighting the importance of accounting for these factors in cosmological analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a Monte-Carlo method to quantify the impact of cluster shape and orientation on Planck SZ detection completeness and weak lensing mass bias, providing new insights into selection effects.
Findings
Orientation affects cluster detection probability, favoring elongated clusters along the line of sight.
Bias in weak lensing mass estimates due to orientation ranges from 0-4%.
Lower mass clusters are more impacted by orientation-related biases.
Abstract
Galaxy cluster abundance measurements are a valuable tool for constraining cosmological parameters like the mass density () and density fluctuation amplitude (). Wide area surveys detect clusters based on observables, such as the total integrated Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect signal () in the case of Planck. Quantifying the survey selection function is necessary for a cosmological analysis, with completeness representing the probability of detecting a cluster as a function of its intrinsic properties. Employing a Monte-Carlo method, we inject triaxial cluster profiles into random positions within the Planck all-sky maps, and subsequently determine the completeness of the Planck-selected CHEXMATE sample as a function of both geometry and SZ brightness. This is then used to generate 1000 mock CHEX-MATE cluster catalogs, and the distribution of shapes and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
