TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel perspective on neural networks as dynamical systems on latent spaces, enabling new analysis tools for understanding model behavior, generalization, and out-of-distribution detection.
Contribution
It proposes a method to interpret autoencoders as vector fields on latent manifolds, providing insights into model properties and data representations without additional training.
Findings
Latent vector fields can reveal attractor points formed during training.
The approach helps analyze generalization and memorization regimes.
It enables detection of out-of-distribution samples through trajectory analysis.
Abstract
Neural networks transform high-dimensional data into compact, structured representations, often modeled as elements of a lower dimensional latent space. In this paper, we present an alternative interpretation of neural models as dynamical systems acting on the latent manifold. Specifically, we show that autoencoder models implicitly define a latent vector field on the manifold, derived by iteratively applying the encoding-decoding map, without any additional training. We observe that standard training procedures introduce inductive biases that lead to the emergence of attractor points within this vector field. Drawing on this insight, we propose to leverage the vector field as a representation for the network, providing a novel tool to analyze the properties of the model and the data. This representation enables to: (i) analyze the generalization and memorization regimes of neural…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Oral
- It is a novel and distinctive observation that iteratively applying $f$ induces the residual vector field $V(z) = f(z)-z$, whose fixed points serve as attractors toward which nearby trajectories converge. - The claim that this vector field is proportional to the score of the latent prior $q(z)$ is highly intriguing; it effectively generalizes the small‑noise limit result for denoising autoencoders to the latent space. - Proposition 2 is particularly insightful: when training biases the model t
- The explanation for why contraction emerges *naturally* via initialization bias, explicit regularization, and implicit regularization would benefit from a stronger theoretical foundation or, at least, a more formal set of sufficient conditions. - Several assumptions, e.g., smoothness of the induced latent distribution and related regularity, are stated, but the extent to which they hold for large‑scale models in practice remains unclear.
- This new perspective on AEs is simple and intuitive. It is somewhat surprising that this type of analysis has not been done sooner. - The links to regularization, memorization, and generalization are interesting, and the proposed framework could be a useful analysis tool. - The theoretical framework is well presented and clear, and the theoretical results appear correct. - The paper is well written; the dynamical-systems terminology is clear and intuitive. - The experiments using AEs extracted
- The scope of the paper is somewhat limited since the theory only holds for AEs. - While the proposed framework is well justified and interesting in its own right, its impact is difficult to gauge. There is no immediate practical impact for practitioners, nor any strikingly new finding that this framework helps uncover. However, the work has clear potential as a future analysis tool. See the Questions section for more precise comments.
- **(S1)**: I appreciate the paper's motivation and theoretical foundation. It provides an interesting view of (AE) neural networks and provides a novel tool for analysis. - **(S2)**: I think that the experimental section is honestly aiming to demonstrate the method's utility with respect to different downstream tasks and different datasets. I also appreciate the details and additional results listed in the appendix.
- **(W1)**: The proposed method is limited to reconstruction-based autoencoder neural networks. The authors are aware of this as they do mention this in the imitation section.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
