Anderson transition in high dimension: comments to arXiv:2403.01974
I. M. Suslov (P.L.Kapitza Institute for Physical Problems, Moscow, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent proposal on the Anderson transition in high dimensions, highlighting issues with the use of branching graphs and discussing the validity of the hypothesis presented.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of a new approach to the Anderson transition, questioning its assumptions and methodology.
Findings
Identifies flaws in the branching graph approach
Raises doubts about the validity of the proposed hypothesis
Offers alternative perspectives on high-dimensional Anderson transitions
Abstract
In the recent submission arXiv:2403.01974, Altshuler et al suggested a new approach to the Anderson transition in high dimensions. The main idea consists in the use of the branching graphs instead of high-dimensional lattices: it does not look very convincing, but we do not want to stress this point. Since the authors welcome comments, we put forward a lot of objections to their exposition of the general situation. The arising hypothesis is given in the end.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
