First measurement of neutron capture multiplicity in neutrino-oxygen neutral-current quasi-elastic-like interactions using an accelerator neutrino beam
T2K Collaboration: K. Abe, S. Abe, R. Akutsu, H. Alarakia-Charles, Y.I. Alj Hakim, S. Alonso Monsalve, L. Anthony, M. Antonova, S. Aoki, K.A. Apte, T. Arai, T. Arihara, S. Arimoto, Y. Asada, Y. Ashida, N. Babu, G. Barr, D. Barrow, P. Bates, M. Batkiewicz-Kwasniak, V. Berardi

TL;DR
This paper presents the first measurement of neutron capture multiplicity in neutrino-oxygen neutral-current interactions using the Super-Kamiokande detector with an accelerator neutrino beam, providing new experimental data for neutrino interaction modeling.
Contribution
It introduces a novel measurement of neutron capture multiplicity in neutrino-oxygen interactions at T2K, utilizing neural networks for gamma-ray signal identification and comparing results with simulation predictions.
Findings
Measured mean neutron capture multiplicity: 1.37 ± 0.33 (stat.) ± 0.17-0.27 (syst.)
Observed discrepancy with simulation predictions within 2.3 sigma
Identified hadron-nucleus interaction modeling as a key source of systematic uncertainty
Abstract
We report the first measurement of neutron capture multiplicity in neutrino-oxygen neutral-current quasi-elastic-like interactions at the gadolinium-loaded Super-Kamiokande detector using the T2K neutrino beam, which has a peak energy of about 0.6 GeV. A total of 30 neutral-current quasi-elastic-like event candidates were selected from T2K data corresponding to an exposure of protons on target. The ray signals resulting from neutron captures were identified using a neural network. The flux-averaged mean neutron capture multiplicity was measured to be , which is compatible within than predictions obtained using our nominal simulation. We discuss potential sources of systematic uncertainty in the prediction and demonstrate that a significant portion of this discrepancy arises from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
