Functoriality of the Klein-Williams Invariant and Universality Theory
Ba\c{s}ak K\"u\c{c}\"uk

TL;DR
This paper investigates the functorial properties of the Klein-Williams invariant, compares it with the equivariant Lefschetz invariant, and explores their universality and relationships through explicit examples.
Contribution
It demonstrates the functoriality of the Klein-Williams invariant and develops the universality theory for such invariants, including explicit computations and comparisons.
Findings
$ ext{ell}_G(f)$ is functorial.
Explicit computation of the universal invariant group.
Comparison between $ ext{ell}_G(f)$, $ ext{lambda}_G(f)$, and the universal invariant.
Abstract
Both the Klein-Williams invariant from \cite{KW2} and the generalized equivariant Lefschetz invariant from \cite{weber07} serve as complete obstructions to the fixed point problem in the equivariant setting. The latter is functorial in the sense of Definition \ref{functorial}. The first part of this paper aims to demonstrate that is also functorial. The second part summarizes the ``universality" theory of such functorial invariants, developed in \cites{lueck1999, Weber06}, and explicitly computes the group in which the universal invariant lies, under a certain hypothesis. The final part explores the relationship between and , and presents examples to compare , , and the universal invariant.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
