Counting Small Induced Subgraphs: Scorpions Are Easy but Not Trivial
Radu Curticapean, Simon D\"oring, Daniel Neuen

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous beliefs by showing that counting certain small induced subgraphs called scorpions can be done efficiently, revealing new insights into the complexity of subgraph counting problems.
Contribution
It demonstrates that scorpion graphs can be counted in polynomial time, refuting the conjecture that all non-meager properties are hard to count.
Findings
Scorpion graphs can be counted in $O(n^4)$ time for all $k$.
A variant achieves arbitrary intermediate complexity assuming ETH.
Refutes the conjecture that all non-meager properties are $ ext{ extsterling}$W[1]-hard.
Abstract
We consider the parameterized problem IndSub for fixed graph properties : Given a graph and an integer , this problem asks to count the number of induced -vertex subgraphs satisfying . D\"orfler et al. [Algorithmica 2022] and Roth et al. [SICOMP 2024] conjectured that IndSub is W[1]-hard for all non-meager properties , i.e., properties that are nontrivial for infinitely many . This conjecture has been confirmed for several restricted types of properties, including all hereditary properties [STOC 2022] and all edge-monotone properties [STOC 2024]. In this work, we refute this conjecture by showing that scorpion graphs, certain -vertex graphs which were introduced more than 50 years ago in the context of the evasiveness conjecture, can be counted in time for all . A simple variant of this construction results in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
