TL;DR
This paper explores the connection between inverse optimization and inverse reinforcement learning for Markov decision processes, introducing a regularized framework that incorporates prior beliefs and improves the learning of cost functions and policies.
Contribution
It presents a novel regularized inverse optimization framework for IRL and apprenticeship learning, addressing ill-posedness and demonstrating convergence with stochastic mirror descent.
Findings
Regularization improves cost vector and policy learning.
The framework generalizes existing apprenticeship learning models.
Numerical experiments validate the importance of regularization.
Abstract
The relationship between inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and inverse optimization (IO) for Markov decision processes (MDPs) has been relatively underexplored in the literature, despite addressing the same problem. In this work, we revisit the relationship between the IO framework for MDPs, IRL, and apprenticeship learning (AL). We incorporate prior beliefs on the structure of the cost function into the IRL and AL problems, and demonstrate that the convex-analytic view of the AL formalism emerges as a relaxation of our framework. Notably, the AL formalism is a special case in our framework when the regularization term is absent. Focusing on the suboptimal expert setting, we formulate the AL problem as a regularized min-max problem. The regularizer plays a key role in addressing the ill-posedness of IRL by guiding the search for plausible cost functions. To solve the resulting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
