TL;DR
DecisionFlow introduces a structured decision modeling framework for large language models, enabling transparent reasoning and improved accuracy in high-stakes decision-making tasks.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach that guides LLMs to reason over structured representations and infer utility functions, enhancing explainability and performance.
Findings
Achieves up to 30% accuracy improvement over prompting baselines.
Enhances alignment and interpretability of decisions.
Demonstrates effectiveness on high-stakes benchmarks.
Abstract
In high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance, effective decision-making demands not just accurate outcomes but transparent and explainable reasoning. However, current language models often lack the structured deliberation needed for such tasks, instead generating decisions and justifications in a disconnected, post-hoc manner. To address this, we propose DecisionFlow, a novel decision modeling framework that guides models to reason over structured representations of actions, attributes, and constraints. Rather than predicting answers directly from prompts, DecisionFlow builds a semantically grounded decision space and infers a latent utility function to evaluate trade-offs in a transparent, utility-driven manner. This process produces decisions tightly coupled with interpretable rationales reflecting the model's reasoning. Empirical results on two high-stakes benchmarks show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
