Agent-Environment Alignment via Automated Interface Generation
Kaiming Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Ziyue Wang, Peng Li, Yang Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces ALIGN, an automated interface generation framework that reduces agent-environment misalignment in LLM-based agents, leading to significant performance improvements across various interactive tasks without altering agent or environment code.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel auto-aligned interface generation method that enhances environment interaction for LLM agents, addressing a key bottleneck in agent performance.
Findings
Up to 45.67% success rate improvement in ALFWorld.
ALIGN generalizes across different agent architectures.
Enriches static and step-wise environment information.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents have shown impressive reasoning capabilities in interactive decision-making tasks. These agents interact with environment through intermediate interfaces, such as predefined action spaces and interaction rules, which mediate the perception and action. However, mismatches often happen between the internal expectations of the agent regarding the influence of its issued actions and the actual state transitions in the environment, a phenomenon referred to as \textbf{agent-environment misalignment}. While prior work has invested substantially in improving agent strategies and environment design, the critical role of the interface still remains underexplored. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that agent-environment misalignment poses a significant bottleneck to agent performance. To mitigate this issue, we propose \textbf{ALIGN}, an…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. This paper identifies a real and underexplored problem of agent-environment misalignment and shows through motivating examples and pilot studies (e.g., "Examine bookshelf"->“Nothing happens” in ALFWorld) that it significantly limits agent performance. 2. ALIGN introduces a plug-and-play prompting wrapper approach that does not require changing agent logic or environment code. 3. ALIGN is evaluated on 4 benchmarks, 5 agent methods, and multiple LLMs. The performance improvements seem to be la
1. Ideal Assumption: The method assumes that environment rules are fully available to agents, which may not always be the case in real-world settings. 2. Potential Unfair Comparison: In the Analyzer Prompt Template for Misalignment Analysis, the Gold Action and Observation Sequence are provided, which is often unavailable. This causes unfair comparison with other baselines that do not have access to them. 3. Potential Unfair Comparison: In the Implementation Detail section, it is mentioned tha
(1) The work introduces a new problem formulation: agent-environment misalignment, which captures failure modes overlooked by prior works focusing solely on reasoning or reward modeling. (2) The authors conducted extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks and agent frameworks, providing strong empirical evidence for the robustness and generalization capability of the proposed approach.
(1) Figure 1 is difficult to understand and is not well aligned with the examples in lines 100–103 (INFERRULES and WRAPSTEP). In addition, some figures could benefit from clearer captions. (2) While this paper elucidates the functionality and semantic boundaries of the Interface through descriptive language in several places, it does not provide a formal definition. This limitation hinders a more precise analysis of the agent–environment misalignment problem and a deeper understanding of the AL
1. The paper clearly defines the problem and is well motivated, identifying agent–environment misalignment as a key, underexplored bottleneck and substantiating its impact with preliminary evidence, which provides strong motivation for the work. 2. The methodology is novel: unlike manually engineered interfaces, ALIGN automatically detects misalignments and synthesizes interfaces, introducing the notion of an auto-aligned interface (Sec. 3). 3. The empirical study is substantial, demonstratin
1. The experiments are conducted in environments with discrete, text-based action spaces. It is less clear how the ALIGN framework would scale to environments with significantly more complex, high-dimensional, or continuous observation/action spaces; It is less clear how the ALIGN framework would scale to environments with significantly more complex, or continuous observation/action spaces. 2. The dependence on high-capability models. The Analyzer and Optimizer currently rely on top proprietar
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Business Process Modeling and Analysis
