Tools for Characterizing the Numerical Error of Stellar Oscillation Codes
Richard H. D. Townsend, Rianna V. Kuenzi, J{\o}rgen Christensen-Dalsgaard

TL;DR
This paper introduces tools called 'error measures' to quantify the numerical errors in stellar oscillation codes, focusing on the GYRE code but applicable broadly, by analyzing how calculation parameters affect accuracy.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel set of error measures for characterizing numerical errors in stellar oscillation codes, with a detailed analysis of their behavior and an idealized error model.
Findings
Error measures effectively quantify numerical errors.
Error behavior depends on calculation parameters like grid points.
The analysis is applicable beyond the GYRE code.
Abstract
Stellar oscillation codes are software instruments that evaluate the normal-mode frequencies of an input stellar model. While inter-code comparisons are often used to confirm the correctness of calculations, they are not suitable for characterizing the numerical error of an individual code. To address this issue, we introduce a set of tools -- 'error measures' -- that facilitate this characterization. We explore the behavior of these error measures as calculation parameters, such as the number of radial grid points used to discretize the oscillation equations, are varied; and we summarize this behavior via an idealized error model. While our analysis focuses on the GYRE code, it remains broadly applicable to other oscillation codes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Scientific Research and Discoveries
