TabularMath: Understanding Math Reasoning over Tables with Large Language Models
Shi-Yu Tian, Zhi Zhou, Wei Dong, Kun-Yang Yu, Ming Yang, Zi-Jian Cheng, Lan-Zhe Guo, Yu-Feng Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces TabularMath, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' reasoning over tables, addressing real-world challenges like incomplete data and diverse table formats.
Contribution
It presents AutoT2T, a neuro-symbolic framework for transforming math problems into scalable tabular reasoning tasks, and develops TabularMath, a multi-faceted benchmark for this purpose.
Findings
Table complexity and reasoning difficulty jointly affect performance.
Low-quality tables significantly hinder reasoning accuracy.
Text-based tables are generally easier for models to interpret.
Abstract
Mathematical reasoning has long been a key benchmark for evaluating large language models. Although substantial progress has been made on math word problems, the need for reasoning over tabular data in real-world applications has been overlooked. For instance, applications such as business intelligence demand not only multi-step numerical reasoning with tables but also robustness to incomplete or inconsistent information. However, comprehensive evaluation in this area is severely limited, constrained by the reliance on manually collected tables that are difficult to scale and the lack of coverage for potential traps encountered in real-world scenarios. To address this problem, we propose AutoT2T, a neuro-symbolic framework that controllably transforms math word problems into scalable and verified tabular reasoning tasks. Building on this pipeline, we develop TabularMath, a benchmark…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
