From Single to Multi-Granularity: Toward Long-Term Memory Association and Selection of Conversational Agents
Derong Xu, Yi Wen, Pengyue Jia, Yingyi Zhang, wenlin zhang, Yichao Wang, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Xiangyu Zhao, Enhong Chen, Tong Xu

TL;DR
MemGAS introduces a multi-granularity memory framework for conversational agents, improving long-term memory retention and response personalization by adaptive selection and filtering of memory units, outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
The paper proposes MemGAS, a novel multi-granularity memory system with adaptive selection and filtering, enhancing long-term dialogue memory in conversational agents.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art methods on four benchmarks.
Effective in diverse query types and retrieval settings.
Enhances coherence and personalization in long-term conversations.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been widely adopted in conversational agents. However, the increasingly long interactions between users and agents accumulate extensive dialogue records, making it difficult for LLMs with limited context windows to maintain a coherent long-term dialogue memory and deliver personalized responses. While retrieval-augmented memory systems have emerged to address this issue, existing methods often depend on single-granularity memory segmentation and retrieval. This approach falls short in capturing deep memory connections, leading to partial retrieval of useful information or substantial noise, resulting in suboptimal performance. To tackle these limits, we propose MemGAS, a framework that enhances memory consolidation by constructing multi-granularity association, adaptive selection, and retrieval. MemGAS is based on multi-granularity memory units…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The paper presents a novel idea by utilizing the multi-granularity of each session to learn a structured long-term memory bank and retrieve relevant information to queries. 2. The GMM distribution assumption of the similarity scores in dynamical memory association is concise and flexible, compared to other oversimplified classification models. 3. The core algorithms, GMM clustering and PPR, are model-based approaches that ensure the entire model is training-free and preserves interpretabili
1. The paper focuses on four fixed granularities (session, turn, summary, keyword) created from a session chunk. This design feels a bit rigid. The core weakness identified in prior work is often the choice of fixed segmentation (e.g., semantic-based clustering/segmentation). Why were only these four chosen? Other approaches integrate hierarchical structures (RAPTOR, MemTree). It remains unclear that whether the simple summary/keyword levels fully address the limitations of hierarchical knowledg
- MemGAS introduces a novel multi-granularity memory framework with Gaussian Mixture Models for memory association and an entropy-driven router for adaptive granularity selection, surpassing existing single-granularity methods. - The entropy-based router allows MemGAS to dynamically select the most relevant granularity for each query, enhancing retrieval efficiency and reducing noise. This adaptability is a clear improvement over fixed-granularity methods, which can fail to balance information c
- The level of edge construction is inconsistent throughout the paper. Line 184-185 and the upper-right part of Figure 2 suggest that each granularity of each memory is treated as a node. Still, Equation 5 computes the weight on each memory across different granularities, which indicates that the PPR is run on a memory association graph where each memory $M_i$ is a node. Additionally, the word "vectors" in line 157 is also ambiguous, without pointing out whether the entire memory bank $\mathcal{
1. the paper is well-motivated, well-supported, easy-to-follow. 2. the experimental results are solid and comprehensive in terms of effectiveness and efficiency.
no significant weakness identified
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Semantic Web and Ontologies
